The ideal review does not exist (yet). Every bird sings as it is beaked. Each reviewer writes from his own personality. Nevertheless, there are a number of elements that contribute to a fun, valuable, pleasant to read review.
- The review consists of more than one sentence. A nice text of 3 to 4 lines reads much more pleasantly than a concise one-liner in telegram style.
- The review is informative in terms of content. Are the photos correct? Are the services offered to your satisfaction? Are there extras and what do they cost? How's the mood? And so on.
- The review is nuanced. It's really unlikely that everything was perfect, or that everything was pure crap. This applies to both the review text and the assessment of the services (the stars).
- Not all services are rated with the same number of stars, and only the applicable services are rated. The credibility of a review disappears when a private visit is also rated for services like a gangbang, two types of threesomes at once, etc.
- The review text and the assessment of the services correspond. It is strange when the review text is extremely positive but the rating of the services never exceeds three stars (or vice versa).
- The review respects privacy. Private information never belongs in a review. Name and address details, striking body features that are not visible in the photos, a person's family situation, studies or a 'normal' profession, etc. belong to the private sphere.
- The review avoids suspicion. Insinuations of STDs or drug use in particular are not allowed.
- The review doesn't hurt. Bad language or belittling someone as a person is not desirable.
- The review describes a date that actually happened. Reports of a no-show or not giving the house number are relevant but are bundled separately.
- The review is written in Dutch (preferably) or in English. The target audience is the fellow walkers, not the sex workers involved.